|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The following is a reprinting of one of the selections of The NIMH File, an APAzine published circa June 1986 by Timothy D. Fay. It included some fan-fiction, fan-art/comics, and this little informational piece, written by the PR guy that worked with Bluth Animation at the time Secret of NIMH was released. While I have little hope of being able to contact the authors of the (admittedly very good) stories and art in order to get permission to reprint them, I thought that I'd be justified in reprinting this, as it is a purely informational piece written by someone "official." It answeres and raises some interesting questions about our beloved film. So without further ado... NIMH NOTES #1 - "Questions & Answers"by John Cawley In the summer of 1983, I was hired by the Bluth team as Director of Public Relations. (At that time, they were working under the banner of Bluth Group and producing videogames.) One of my functions was to handle fan mail. Most of this mail fell into two catagories: They were the "gimmies" or the "help." "Gimmies" always wanted something or other. Some wanted an autograph, drawing, or photo. Some had an "important" question that needed to be answered (like how old was Don, what was it like working at Disney, what was his favorite Disney movie, why did he stop making features, was he working on this or that title of film, was there going to be a NIMH sequel, etc.). Some merely wanted to be "friends" with Don (usually because, as they stated, they had no other friends who understood them). The "Helps" always wanted to help. They offered advice on how to do the next picture, or specific titles. Some sent scripts, characters etc. for use in future games, films, etc. Others sent resumes for any number of positions. In this group were those who simply wanted to write and help by giving moral support. As one had written, "I don't care if NIMH was a flop, I liked it." Another commented that even though NIMH was a "low budget picture, it usually didn't show." One stated that a jazz score would have made the film more successful. However, occasionally a letter came in that was more... interesting? (No, many letters were interesting.) More... serious? (No, almost all the writers of fan mail are serious!) I guess "mature" is the word that would fit. (Very little fan mail comes across mature... even those letters written by fans in their sixties!) One such mature letter was accompanied by a box of some 50 children's letters. It seems a class in New York had taken the time to read Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH and then seen the film, THE SECRET OF NIMH. They then each wrote down five questions regarding the differences found between the two works. The questions ranged from logical (why the name change) to the obscure (did we want to put Disney characters in the story). The following reply explains the rest. Oh, after the letter are some questions of interest to true NIHMphomaniacs. I hope you enjoy them. Sincerely, December 7, 1983 RE: Story Differences in THE SECRET OF NIMHDear [censored] & Students: I want to thank you not only for taking the time to study the differences between our production of THE SECRET OF NIMH and the novel, Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH, but for letting us assist in the answering of some of the questions raised. We apologize for the delay in answering, but we only recently received your packet of letters from MGM/UA. The students asked many questions, but generally seemed to focus in on the same topics. Having discussed them with Don Bluth, John Pomeroy, Gary Goidman, and Will Finn (the authors of the script), here are the answers to most (and the most frequently asked) questions. THE NAME CHANGEWe had originally planned to use the name Mrs. Frisby in the film, and even had the dialogue recorded that way. However, Whammo Toys, maker of the plastic Frisbee, claimed to have control over the name through Trademark. (Unlike a copyright law which must show that you have exactly copied an item, trademarks also control the "sound" of the name.) For this reason, the name was changed to "Brisby," and much of the dialogue had to be re-recorded for the film. THE AMULETThe amulet was a device, or symbol, to represent the internal power of Mrs. Brisby. It also was a gift from her husband, a sign of his love. The stone/amulet had no real power, itself. It was only when Mrs. Brisby's strength was employed that it could become a force. In many ways, it was an extension of Mrs. Brisby... a visual extension of an internal (and harder to show in a film) power. NICODEMUS AS WIZARDThis change was made to create more "mystery" around both Nicodemus and the entire rat colony. Once again, making Mrs. Brisby have to search both outwards, and inwardly for help. MAKING JENNER EVILIn the book, Jenner is actually a traitor who simply leaves. In the film, he becomes a more dramatic figure be being a visible enemy. (Like many changes made when books become movies, the change is chosen to add drama to the story.) THE DEATH OF NICODEMUSAgain, to help develop characters, some changes need to be made. Nicodemus must die so that Justin can become the new leader of the rats. Without this action, Justin doesn't have the ability to grow and change in the film. Each character needs a direction. JEREMY'S LARGER ROLEJeremy, the crow, was given a larger role because his character had a great deal of entertainment value. (Visual material is preferred in films.) Also Dom DeLuise, the voice of Jeremy, desired a larger part to help develop the character more fully. JUSTIN DOES NOT SAVE MRS. BRISBY FROM CAGE
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||